Posts Tagged Tea Parties

Another One Misses The Point

Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank just doesn’t get it.

Wouldn’t that be the kind thing to say?  I mean, one would have to believe that Dana is no fool.  A long time reporter, he went to Yale (just another member of Skull and Bones hanging near the White House.)  And, he was smart enough to get away from Keith Olbermann before it was too late, and his brain completely turned to raspberry Jell-o.

In today’s Washington Post, Milbank sets his sights on Senator Scott Brown (R-MA).  You know, THE Scott Brown.  The Scott Brown who was 30 points behind senatorial candidate Martha Coakley (D-MA), only to have the force of the Tea Party movement, the awakening of the electorate in Massachusetts, as well as his own perfectly timed statements of universal truths, push him to a convincing nee crushing defeat of Coakley.  Independents in Mass had spoken…..loudly.

The article written by Milbank is a child-like, snarky attack on Sen. Brown for how he handled being sworn into office.  It starts as a gigantic whine about how Brown listened to those evil, wicked conservative radio hosts – as if, somehow, Brown is a puppet? – and after accepting that he would be seated on Feb. 11th, he, “…requested — no, demanded! — that he be seated promptly — no, immediately!”  The Senate Democrats seated him on Thursday, February 4th.

Milbank then continues with a truly foolhardy article that would make an attempt at humor, if only it wasn’t dripping with his incessant vitriol.  In the article, Milbank:

- refers to Sen. Brown as Sen. Centerfold, due to some modeling Brown did in his 20′s in Cosmopolitan magazine.  He was naked in the photo shoot, and it was 30 years ago.

- states that “Brown’s surprise victory impressed many people.  None more than Brown himself.” (Milbank’s attempt to label the new Senator an egomaniac.)

- states that, “The one declarative position Brown did take – “The last stimulus bill did not create one new job” – was demonstrably untrue.”

- states that Brown is getting Kennedy’s old office, and that it was Kennedy’s seat.

You would have to be simply daft to write this article, and I am more than sure others will pick this nonsense piece of filler apart in the coming days.  Here, however, is the reality behind the four points Milbank attempts to make:

- refers to Sen. Brown as Sen. Centerfold, due to some modeling Brown did in his 20′s in Cosmopolitan magazine.  He was naked in the photo shoot, and it was 30 years ago.

Does calling him Sen. Centerfold pass for comedy in your house?  Are you riffling through Sen. Franken’s (D-MN) trash, looking for jokes that he discarded?  Amongst other Statists, the moniker might stick.  But, with worthless jokes meant to discredit like that one, the only moniker that will stick around is this one – (R-MA.)

- states that “Brown’s surprise victory impressed many people.  None more than Brown himself.”

Wrong, Mr. Milbank.  None more than the Democratic elite establishment, itself. Democrats are still shaking their heads over this one.  And yet we still have Democratic Senators and Representatives dismissing the Tea Parties, blaming their inability to get anything done with a 60 seat Senate majority on the GOP and attempting to persuade the American people that saying no is a bad thing, even when said on principles.  My guess is that Sen. Brown is thrilled that he won, and so he should be.  He ran a great campaign, and the people of Massachusetts voted for his message.  Massachusetts voters not voting for the hand picked Democrat….now that is ego!!

- states that, “The one declarative position Brown did take – “The last stimulus bill did not create one new job” – was demonstrably untrue.”

Government can not create jobs, Mr. Milbank.  Only the private sector can create jobs. However, government can create conditions that are favorable to the business owners – by getting rid of over regulation, excessive paperwork, lowering taxes and, in general, getting the hell out of the way.

- states that Brown is getting Kennedy’s old office, and that it was Kennedy’s seat.

Dana, have you learned nothing?  Watch this.


Dana Milbank just doesn’t get it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Principle. Not Party.

Who would have ever thought that high noon would take place in Oswego, NY?  Who would have ever thought that in a place known as the New York 23rd Congressional District – which borders Vermont, Canada and Lake Ontario, that includes such big cities as Potsdam, Watertown, and Plattsburgh – the true story of tea parties would be told,  Americans would realize their undeniable power and politics as we know it in America would be knocked on its ear.

The backstory is simple.  The NY-23rd is a Republican stronghold, and has been for a number of years.  The previous US congressman, John McHugh, resigned in September to be come the new Secretary of the Army, and a special election is scheduled for November 3rd.  Two weeks before the election, in this highly Republican district, the Democrat, Bill Owens, has 33 percent of the vote.  Why is it that a Democrat is leading the way?  Well, that is a question for the GOP in the NY-23rd.  Their candidate, Dede Scozzafava, has 29 percent of the vote.

Enter Doug Hoffman.  He’s an accountant.  He’s running on the Conservative ticket.  Two weeks out, he has 23 percent of the vote.  And over the past week, he’s been endorsed by former Congressman Dick Armey, Steve Forbes, Congresswoman Michelle Bachman (R-MN), former Senator and presidental candidate Fred Thompson (R-TN), Governor Tim Pawlenty (R-MN) and former Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK).

Republicans not endorsing the Republican candidate?  Strange?  Odd?  A total collapse of GOP politics in the US?  No.  It’s very simple:

Principle.  Not Party.

The concept of “Principle.  Not Party.,” has been a central tenet of the Tea Party movement.  It requires us to view all candidates for elected office based on their words, their plans and their values.  No longer are Americans going to be dependent on an (R) or a (D) in front of the candidates name, nor will we feel any pangs of guilt or anguish for voting “third party.”  The Tea Party movement has emboldened, and enabled, every American to take serious stock of their candidates, and to vote for those who best represent their ideals.

The concept has confused as many as it has enamored.  Those who live with their head in the sand, in a politics as usual world, are shell-shocked – like the GOP in the NY-23rd.  They believed, through a veil of ignorance, and navel-gazing ego, that they could nominate anyone, and the vote was assured.  It didn’t matter that, like in the case of Scozzafava, the candidate has ties with ACORN through a group called the Working Families Party (she sought their endorsement in 2004 as Assemblywoman,) and is rumored to have discussed switching parties for this special election.

What mattered to the GOP is that they nominated a Republican, and that everyone will fall in line to vote for her.  Ignorantly, they paraded like The Queen in “Snow White”, claiming their candidate to be the fairest of them all.  None of them, however, dare look into the mirror.  They are victims of an ego driven past, worrying not about the voter, but rather their ill-timed sense of “getting along.”  So, they nominate a terrible candidate, and then sit back, believing that their base will once again do what they are told.  After all, what are you going to do – vote for the Democrat?

Principle.  Not Party.

However, those who have been aware, and awake, are not surprised at all.  They recognized that the GOP in the NY-23rd was playing in the realm of politics as usual, and reminded them that these are not politics as usual times.  The surging that  followed by the Conservative candidate Hoffman is not something of a miracle.  It is something of sheer will, total common sense and an undeniable reality, inspired by the power of the Tea Party Movement.  So undeniable, that it will forever shape the landscape of the GOP – and politics for all parties in the United States.  The American people are done with politics as usual, and the Tea Parties are the sole catalyst for this change.  A change that started in February of 2009, continued to April 15th, 2009, through the Town Hall Summer of 2009 and has continued since the march on DC on 9/12, the West Coast rally of 912West and the hundreds of Tea Parties throughout America since that first one in February.

This change is quantifiable, as opposed to simply a catchy slogan.  The Tea Parties demand an observance of (what I refer to as) The Four Basics:  The Constitution, Capitalism, Fiscal Responsibility and Smaller Government.  When a voter within the Tea Party movement looks at a candidate, they first look to those four basic principles.  If the candidate follows The Four Basics, then they are acceptable (but, by no means is a vote assured!)  From there, we look at other factors, and other candidates who also follow The Four Basics.  Candidates, elected officials and current “party” leaders who fail to recognize, and accept this as the new reality, will be tomorrow’s footnote.

One week out from the vote in the NY-23rd, the Conservative Hoffman is in the lead with 34% of the vote.  The Democrat Owens has 29% of the vote.  The Republican Scozzafava has 14% of the vote.  The reality is deafening, as the American voter is screaming.

Principle.  Not Party.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,