Massa, and Serving the Statists

The Eric Massa story continues.

The story starts last week, when Massa, (D-NY) a freshman Congressman, was implicated in a potential sex scandal.  It came to light that he may have made inappropriate advances towards a male staffer.  A few days later, Massa came out with a statement saying that he would resign on the following Monday.  That yes, he uses extremely foul language in his inner office, and that the blame lies with him about it.

But now, a new story.  However, it’s a same old story.  Massa is a “no” vote on Forced Universal Health Care.  He has been in the past, and he continues to be now. The Obama Administration has already stated, in all sorts of language, that they will do whatever it takes to pass their Statist agenda.  Now, Massa is saying that the administration is behind this story – that the supposed “inappropriate advance” is total nonsense, and that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) is guilty of leaking the story, and perpetuating the myth.

Massa claims that it is not a string of incidents, but rather an incident.  One.  At a wedding of a Massa staffer on New Years Eve, and (my words) of guys being goofs. Massa’s wife was not feeling well, and they both left the wedding to go back to the hotel room.  Massa then comes back to the party to sing “Auld Lang Syne.”  He dances with the bride, with a bridesmaid and then joins a table of staffers – all men, and all single (except for Massa.)  One of the staffers turns to Massa, and jokes that Massa should make his move on the bridesmaid.  Massa then, according to his account, “…grabbed the staff member sitting next to me and I said, ‘What I really ought to be doing is frakking you,’ and then tossled the guy’s hair and left, went to my room, because I knew the party was getting to a point where I shouldn’t be there.”

Massa went on a radio station to explain this story:

Stories are now coming out regarding run-ins with Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, including in the gym showers.  Massa is clear in his most recent statements – the Obama Administration has launched this probe, and has made it public (and leaked it!) in order to force him out of Congress because he is voting no on their Statist prize – Forced Universal Health Care.

Where is the truth?  What is the fiction?  What can be believed?  Why is it happening?

Massa, one would think, has a long way to go in proving any legitimacy in this claim.  He already came out last week and announced that he would be resigning. He mentioned some health issues (a recurrence of cancer.)  He already admitted that he owns this reality.  There is a very open and shut case that can be told about Massa.  This latest outburst could be spun as the last gasps of a dying man.  An angry, bitter, defeated and somewhat out of control man.

But the story is too close to the reality we already know about.  The Administration will stop at nothing to pass Healthcare.  Rahm Emanuel is known as a pit bull, with a history of obscenity-laden tirades and a remarkably gruff style (even President Obama has joked about Emanuel’s profanity.)  It seems to be well within the realm of possibilities that Massa has been hung out to dry by the Administration.  That Rep. Hoyer did leak the probe before it was concluded.  That there is a concentrated effort to get rid of him, so that his vote can not stop the House from passing any convoluted version of Forced Universal Healthcare they wish.

The Statist agenda fits this story.  Nothing can get in the way of their desired goals. The ends always justifies the means.  The possible ruiniation of a man’s career is small potatoes, especially when you consider that the administration is willing to destroy Capitalism to provide less effective health insurance to people who are already have the health insurance of their choice (all in the guise of helping others,) and throw others in jail if they don’t buy health insurance.

Massa is now reconsidering his resignation.  If he does stay in the House, one has to wonder if he will reconsider the “D” after his name, as well.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

How Low Does Politics Go?

A story from the Washington Times, which was reprinted by the good people at Smart Girl Politics.  It seems that the newly formed Nevada Tea Party, which was created as a political party in Nevada, and is running a candidate for Senator, is not in any way affiliated with the Tea Party Movement. The only phone number listed for the party is for the lawyer who did the filing with Nevada, Barry Levnison, who is also named as the party’s secretary. He is known as an Obama supporter, as well as the lawyer who defended John Wayne Bobbit.

Is this the future of politics? Creating fake parties in an attempt to split the vote of the right in favor of the Statists? Do the Tea Parties, and an informed electorate, really scare the Left that much?

The answer is yes.

From the article:

Critics say the party, which already has a candidate for Senate, doesn’t have any connection to the state’s “tea party” movement and looks like an attempt to draw votes from Republicans, thereby aiding embattled Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in his re-election bid.

The party filed a constitution, bylaws and list of officers Jan. 28 with the Nevada secretary of state’s office. The party also has collected the 250 signatures necessary to place Jon Ashjian on the November ballot as a candidate for the seat now held by Mr. Reid, said Nevada secretary of state spokeswoman Pam duPre.

All this came as a shock to Frank Ricotta, a Las Vegas pharmacist and one of the founding members of the state’s tea party movement. Not only was he unaware of any plans to form a third party, he also didn’t know any of the 10 people on the party’s executive committee.

“I talked to some of our people in the north, and none of us recognized any of the names on the filing,” said Mr. Ricotta, whose group Nevada Patriots is part of the Nevada Leaders Coalition, a tea party movement umbrella group.

Tags: , , , , ,

One Year of Tea Party Thanks

365 days ago, I became a member of the Tea Party. I stood on the pier in Santa Monica, and watched a small, but vibrant crowd of strangers get together. I shook near every hand that gathered that day. And I had the privilidge, and, as I look back on it, the honor, to be the first person ever to speak at a Los Angeles Tea Party rally.

In my review of the past 365 days, the economy sank – both the country’s and mine – and businesses floundered – both the country’s and mine .  As a Capitalist, I have always known that if you keep looking, keep searching, keep fighting, keep thinking, keep trying, you will find you way to the success you endeavor. I knew that losing funding on a new business would be painful, (and it was) but it would not be forever. It was the business that lost, not me. I was still here. Organizing Tea Parties, letting my voice be heard, and helping others do the same.

From that first rally in Santa Monica, to the Tax Day Tea Party in Van Nuys, to the success of 912West and all of the events in between and since, I am overjoyed by the response of Los Angeles to the Tea Parties. I am thrilled by its success, and its growth, across the country. I am thrilled to see people actively participating in their nation, running for office on principle-based tickets, not party-based. It seems that there are millions who truly embrace the mantra of “Principle. Not Party.” I am thrilled to see that the movement is moving overseas.  People taking control of their lives, taking responsibility for their past actions, and working to make better choices in the future, for their futures.

Nothing is done alone.  The Tea Party Movement is proof of that.  And while we remain joyously leaderless, (regardless of MSNBC’s claims) there are some people who need to be thanked.  They were first, because someone had to be first.  What makes me feel so great is the knowledge that they are not the last, and that we many not see the last for many years to come (regardless of what Gov. Schwarzenegger says.)

My thanks to Brooks Bayne, Stephen Kruiser, Ashley Nicole Ingram, Justin Smith and Gary Aminoff.  I had a growing friendship with Brooks, but I didn’t know the others.  365 days later, they are friends.  We talk, we drink, we smoke cigars, we laugh, we learn, we argue.  We do the things that friends of a lifetime do.  Our lifetime started 365 days ago.  Our Tea Party bond makes us strong.

My thanks to Top Conservatives on Twitter, created in the fall of 2008, which got people talking to each other.  The hashtag #TCOT made it possible to reach others quickly and effectively, and those early members helped spread the word about Tea Parties, and made them viable across the country.

My thanks to my wife, whom I do not blog about.  And, while I haven’t done the research, I believe this is the first time I have ever referenced her.  As I stated earlier, Nothing is done alone.  While I was organizing, my wife was giving advice, holding down our family, and supporting the decisions that we made to work hard for the Tea Party Movement.  We knew, and we still know, that we control our destinies.  That our children should have the same freedom and liberty that we had.  That this is our motivation.  We owe it to them.  If picking a spouse was a game show, then I’m the guy who won the Amazing Race.  Luckily for me, I’m still on that race with someone I love.

And to all of you I have met over the course of this year.  To the great work you do, and will do, let me say thank you.  In Los Angeles, we don’t believe in career Tea Party politicians.  That is why I have stepped back from organizing, and good people like Michael Fell have come in to lead LA.  While I will never stop being a part of the Tea Party Movement, the Tea Parties are not about one person.  They are about we.  They are about you.  Everyone must participate.  Everyone must put their skin in the game.  Everyone must take responsibility.  Without that, the Tea Party Movement has no chance of survival.  With that, Statism has no chance of survival.

One year later, and I couldn’t be more proud.  A year that brought my family the worst economic times in our history, has made us rich beyond words.  We thank you all for that.

I can not wait to see what 2010 brings us.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Great Olbermann Rebuttal

Last week, I eviscerated MSNBC commentator Ketih Olbermann’s rant about the Tea Party movement.  I described, in detail, that Olbermann was not attacking the Tea Party, as much as he was confessing his own prejudices, and deep-rooted internal racial issues.

However, it seems that the members of the Dallas Tea Party have done a fantastic job in proving Mr. Olbermann’s comments a total farce.

In the immortal words of The Hunt For Red October – “WAY TO GO, DALLAS!!!”

Tags: , , , , ,

9/11 Truthers, Debra Medina and Tea Parties

Today, on the Glenn Beck radio program, gubernatorial candidate Debra Medina was asked about rumors that she is a 9/11 truther.  She was asked, point blank, whether or not the US Government was involved in bring down the World Trade towers.  Her response is not just disheartening, it is pathetic:

She calls herself an “everyday, ordinary person…” and then gives the most political and politically correct answer the world has ever seen.  She aggressively tried to defend her position, and digs the hole even deeper.  Or, is it, that she shows her real character with more clarity?

I am not a truther.  I have looked at their purported evidence, and I see no value in it.  They have convinced me in no way, and I openly question their motives and their intentions.

Debra Medina has painted herself a Tea Party candidate.  Tea Parties are about The Consitution, Capitalism, Ficsal Responsibility and Smaller Government.  I accept that Medina may be for those things, I accept the fact that Truthers may be part of the Tea Party Movement, and I can not ask them to leave. However, they will never get my vote, and I will not allow candidates to publicly take the mantle of Tea Party member, and spew this nonsense.

Debra Medina made her decisions.  Her candidacy may or may not be over.  However, her aligning herself with the Tea Parties as a candidate is.

*****DEBRA MEDINA RESPONDS*****

Here is a link to her website, where she responds to the Glenn Beck interview.

Tags: , , , , ,

Can You Review A Movie?

The Tony Katz Radio Spectacular is hiring a movie reviewer.

Since Roger Ebert outed himself as an innuendo-regurgitating hack in a recent post on Twitter, I decided that it was a good time to help someone else be the movie reviewer of choice.

You can read all about it at All Patriots Media.

Tags: , , ,

Another One Misses The Point

Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank just doesn’t get it.

Wouldn’t that be the kind thing to say?  I mean, one would have to believe that Dana is no fool.  A long time reporter, he went to Yale (just another member of Skull and Bones hanging near the White House.)  And, he was smart enough to get away from Keith Olbermann before it was too late, and his brain completely turned to raspberry Jell-o.

In today’s Washington Post, Milbank sets his sights on Senator Scott Brown (R-MA).  You know, THE Scott Brown.  The Scott Brown who was 30 points behind senatorial candidate Martha Coakley (D-MA), only to have the force of the Tea Party movement, the awakening of the electorate in Massachusetts, as well as his own perfectly timed statements of universal truths, push him to a convincing nee crushing defeat of Coakley.  Independents in Mass had spoken…..loudly.

The article written by Milbank is a child-like, snarky attack on Sen. Brown for how he handled being sworn into office.  It starts as a gigantic whine about how Brown listened to those evil, wicked conservative radio hosts – as if, somehow, Brown is a puppet? – and after accepting that he would be seated on Feb. 11th, he, “…requested — no, demanded! — that he be seated promptly — no, immediately!”  The Senate Democrats seated him on Thursday, February 4th.

Milbank then continues with a truly foolhardy article that would make an attempt at humor, if only it wasn’t dripping with his incessant vitriol.  In the article, Milbank:

- refers to Sen. Brown as Sen. Centerfold, due to some modeling Brown did in his 20’s in Cosmopolitan magazine.  He was naked in the photo shoot, and it was 30 years ago.

- states that “Brown’s surprise victory impressed many people.  None more than Brown himself.” (Milbank’s attempt to label the new Senator an egomaniac.)

- states that, “The one declarative position Brown did take – “The last stimulus bill did not create one new job” – was demonstrably untrue.”

- states that Brown is getting Kennedy’s old office, and that it was Kennedy’s seat.

You would have to be simply daft to write this article, and I am more than sure others will pick this nonsense piece of filler apart in the coming days.  Here, however, is the reality behind the four points Milbank attempts to make:

- refers to Sen. Brown as Sen. Centerfold, due to some modeling Brown did in his 20’s in Cosmopolitan magazine.  He was naked in the photo shoot, and it was 30 years ago.

Does calling him Sen. Centerfold pass for comedy in your house?  Are you riffling through Sen. Franken’s (D-MN) trash, looking for jokes that he discarded?  Amongst other Statists, the moniker might stick.  But, with worthless jokes meant to discredit like that one, the only moniker that will stick around is this one – (R-MA.)

- states that “Brown’s surprise victory impressed many people.  None more than Brown himself.”

Wrong, Mr. Milbank.  None more than the Democratic elite establishment, itself. Democrats are still shaking their heads over this one.  And yet we still have Democratic Senators and Representatives dismissing the Tea Parties, blaming their inability to get anything done with a 60 seat Senate majority on the GOP and attempting to persuade the American people that saying no is a bad thing, even when said on principles.  My guess is that Sen. Brown is thrilled that he won, and so he should be.  He ran a great campaign, and the people of Massachusetts voted for his message.  Massachusetts voters not voting for the hand picked Democrat….now that is ego!!

- states that, “The one declarative position Brown did take – “The last stimulus bill did not create one new job” – was demonstrably untrue.”

Government can not create jobs, Mr. Milbank.  Only the private sector can create jobs. However, government can create conditions that are favorable to the business owners – by getting rid of over regulation, excessive paperwork, lowering taxes and, in general, getting the hell out of the way.

- states that Brown is getting Kennedy’s old office, and that it was Kennedy’s seat.

Dana, have you learned nothing?  Watch this.


Dana Milbank just doesn’t get it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Isn’t It Ironic

Does anyone else find it ironic that the most cutting edge technology company on the planet would, in an ad for its latest gadget, promote the most antiquated product ever?

Tags: , , ,

Good Business Vs. Bad Courts

Yet another example of the over reaching of the courts, the violent attack on business, and how no one is paying attention to this vicious assault.

In the Netherlands, a worker at McDonald’s was fired for putting cheese on a hamburger for a fellow employee.  There was an employee was on break who ordered a hamburger.  Her friend, making the hamburger, decided to be nice on the company’s dime, and added some cheese to the regular burger order.  This was caught by management, and the employee who made the burger was fired.

Enter the lawsuit.  Enter the courts.

The Dutch court decided that the employee was unfairly terminated.  That being fired, for theft, was simply too great of a punishment.  The court decided that the employee deserved back pay, totaling $5984 (USD), as well as paying all court costs and legal fees.

The rational of the court?  ”It was just a slice of cheese.”

Last I checked, there are still laws in the Netherlands.  Also, last I checked, theft is still against the law.  It doesn’t matter if it is a slice of cheese, a loose diamond or a luxury car.  Theft is theft.  For the court to decide that the theft from a major corporation doesn’t measure up is absurd.  For the court to decide that the crime is irrelevant because it was “just a slice of cheese” is arbitrary nonsense, and calls into question the clarity and competence of the court.

If we are going to now decide whether or not something is theft based on the perceived insignificance of the item being pilfered, then what about people who steal a $.99 song?  That can’t be something you can sue over.  After all, it’s just one song…right?  It’s just $.99, right?  Right, Metallica?

Is it not theft because the target of the crime was McDonald’s?  Is there an assumption that this company, with locations around the world and an iconic brand (built on cheeseburgers and paid for from the profits of cheeseburgers!) can, should and must accept theft from its employees because of their size?  Must McDonald’s now build theft in to their operating costs?  I’m not an economist, but that would mean McDonald’s would have to either raise the price of their burgers, or fire employees to manage the cost of this newly, court imposed “tax.”  Firing employees who are doing a good job (and not stealing!)  hurts the employee, and hurts the local economy.  Raising prices on the burger hurts the consumer – and we did nothing wrong.  Why should we have to subsidize the actions of a thief?

The court system simply does not recognize the rights of business.  And, in this case, it went out of its way to attack business.  So did the writer of this article in the Telegraph.  The article ends with a mention of McDonald’s fourth quarter profits:

The decision came days after the fast-food chain reported an increase in net profits by almost 25 per cent in the last quarter of 2009.

De Facto, this reporter is trying to create some type of moral rationale for awarding this thief over $5k, and not punishing her for stealing.  McDonald’s had a great quarter, the reporter is trying to tell us.  They can afford to part with a measly piece of cheese.  Why are they so consumed with profits?!?!?  However, the use of the stat backfires.  By telling us of McDonald’s impressive fourth quarter numbers, we are reminded of McDonald’s ability to control costs, provide a solid product with unmatched consistency and best manage its operations.  We are reminded that – even in this global economy – businesses can achieve financial success if they properly run their companies.  We should be applauding this, and learning from their example.  By adding the profits of McDonald’s as a way of attacking the company, the reporter unwittingly acknowledges the worthless and irrational decision of the court.  The reporter also acknowledges their own remarkably inept observations.

McDonald’s knows better than the courts how to run their company, and was well within their rights to fire this employee.  For the court to think otherwise is an assault on businesses.  We’ve already proven that McDonald’s system is best for employees, customers and local economies.  If the court moves in these directions, and decides to become the HR department for business, then we ensure higher prices, less growth and far more unemployment.  For the reporter to add mention of McDonald’s profits as a way of portraying a David vs. Gloiath situation over a “piece of cheese,” is to further attack business for actually being in business, and is condoning theft of large corporations.

A slice of cheese costs $.13.  McDonald’s hires approximately 1.5 million people.  If each person gets one extra slice of cheese a day for “free,” it will cost McDonald’s $195,000 per day, or  $71,175,000 per year.  How long do you think McDonald’s will stay in business if you moralize theft, and condemn smart business decisions?

Better get that Big Mac while you can.

Tags: , , , , , ,

The Radio Show Begins

I’m thrilled to share this press release with you.  I hope you will all join me on a daily basis.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Tea Party Leader Takes to the Airwaves

Rising Tea Party star and former radio host Tony Katz signs a radio deal with Tan Talk Radio Network to broadcast “The Tony Katz Radio Spectacular” in two states.

Los Angeles, CA January 20, 2010 – Former Florida radio host and current Tea Party organizer Tony Katz has licensed with All Patriots Media, and the Tan Talk Radio Network, to broadcast his show, The Tony Katz Radio Spectacular.  Starting February 1, 2010, the network will air the show in Tampa Bay, FL and Little Rock, AR. Show host Tony Katz covers the important subjects of the day, including those with marginal representation in main stream media.

The one-hour daily show positions the concepts of freedom, liberty and capitalism in proper context.  Focusing on “right vs. wrong”, instead of “right vs. left”, the show features talks on trending topics including healthcare, cap and trade, big government, and constitutional issues.

“I’m thrilled to be back on the air, and it’s incredibly sweet to be returning to Tampa Bay, a town that has done so much for me over the years,” said Tony Katz.  “Being on 880am in Little Rock is going to be wonderful.  It’s the heart-of-America places where you get the most honest conversations.  And I look forward to being a part of those conversations everyday.”

The show is licensed by All Patriots Media and can be heard online at http://allpatriotsmedia.com at 8am PST.  The show airs on the Tan Talk Radio Network in Tampa Bay on 1340am (WTAN) 1350am (WDCF) and 1400am (WZHR) at 11am EST, and in Little Rock on 880am (KLRG) at 10am CST.

All Patriots Media is a multi-media platform for original audio and video content that extols the values of freedom, liberty, and capitalism.  It’s goal is to offer a new slate of entertainment and news, and provide an alternative to main stream options. The All Patriots Media Network (APMN) provides content online, and via traditional broadcast means.

For additional information about The Tony Katz Radio Spectacular or All Patriots Media, contact Tony Katz or visit www.allpatriotsmedia.com

About Tony Katz:

Tony Katz is a Los Angeles Tea Party organizer and speaker that has helped spearhead the growing movement and navigate its direction.  A proud American and capitalist, Tony Katz is co-founder of Neon Chicken.  He is also a blogger at TonyKatz.com and the founder of the Freedom Cigar Club.  Katz is also available as a consultant and speaker.

Tony Katz
All Patriots Media
818-939-4065
info@allpatriotsmedia.com
http://www.allpatriotsmedia.com

# # #

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,